Sundown on the union as PV cells come from Taiwan

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

To understand the potential impact of the preliminary US Department of Commerce ruling regarding import duties for c-Si modules that contain c-Si cells manufactured within China, it is necessary to clarify what the US market represents to leading tier 1 Chinese c-Si module suppliers (in absolute terms), as well as relative to the overall (global) market.

Furthermore, this should be placed in the context of the ‘country-of-origin’ for the various materials that are already being used within ‘branded’ modules sold through the distribution channels, in particular within the US. Ultimately, these issues provide the real scope and impact that any US-based import tariff may have.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

In fact, when reviewing some of the domestic manufacturing restrictions that have been tabled globally for PV panel deployment, a combination of regionally-diverse nuances can be expected in the future. This then requires any c-Si module shipment mix to be configured to satisfy any local import or domestic manufacturing requirements in place at the time.

For countries that have conditions imposed on final module assembly, the obvious solution is to do module assembly in these countries. For any tariff imposed on Chinese-manufactured cells, the solution is to use non-Chinese manufactured cells.

And in this respect, the proposed duties simply add one new ‘obstacle’ to address, the severity of which is ultimately provided by the size of the US PV market relative to the global PV demand. For example, if the US was forecast to comprise >50% of global PV demand, this obstacle would be significant. If the US market is pegged at 10% of global demand, then the impact is clearly less pronounced.

However, flexible value-chain arrangements have characterized c-Si manufacturing in the PV industry (including multi-vendor raw material supply, OEM tolling, contract manufacturing) for many years. Even Tier 1 c-Si manufacturers- with vertical integration from ingot to module – have relied extensively on the use of third-party wafer and cell suppliers. And in the case of cell supply, a significant percentage has already been coming out of Taiwan. Both Chinese and Japanese c-Si module suppliers have been heavy purchasers of Taiwan-based c-Si cells in the past.

Indeed, the entire US market could already have been supplied by c-Si modules using cells that have been exported from Taiwan cell makers in the past few years. Therefore, discussions of having to put a ‘work-around’ in place from scratch are simply not relevant. Taiwan has positioned itself as the powerhouse of c-Si cell manufacturing, with a ‘pure-play’ strategy that has enabled them to refine the cell manufacturing process to be industry-leading today.

In the past, Taiwan-made cells that were exported to China and interconnected into China-branded modules may have been shipped to Germany or Italy, or indeed to the US. From now on, shipping this portion of modules only to the US is likely to be the most pragmatic scenario. Interestingly, a number of Tier 2 China module suppliers had also been heavy users of Taiwan-made c-Si cells: these suppliers may now have a windowofopportunity in the US that they had not considered when OEM cell contracts were put in place.

As illustrated in the attached figure, in order for Chinese module manufacturers to retain a 60% market share within the US market, only 25-30% of cell production from Taiwan is required to be exported to China out to 2016. This level seems entirely manageable and represents little change to the current export shipment mix from Taiwan cell makers.

Read Next

Premium
April 22, 2025
Solar’s rapid expansion has attracted the attention of those opposed to its ongoing success, writes Becquerel Institute CEO Gaëtan Masson.
April 22, 2025
Japanese cell and module manufacturer Toyo Solar has begun production at its solar cell processing plant in Ethiopia.
April 22, 2025
Solar PV developer Atlas Renewable Energy has secured US$510 million in financing for a solar-plus-storage project in Antofagasta, Chile.
April 22, 2025
The US Department of Commerce has issued anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tariffs on solar cell imports from Southeast Asia.
April 22, 2025
JA Solar has started delivery of 1GW of its DeepBlue 4.0 Pro modules to the 2GW Suji Sandland project in Inner Mongolia, China.
April 22, 2025
Colombian energy supplier Celsia has acquired a 375MW solar PV portfolio in Colombia from renewables developer Mainstream Renewable Power.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Media Partners, Solar Media Events
April 23, 2025
Fortaleza, Brazil
Solar Media Events
April 29, 2025
Dallas, Texas
Media Partners, Solar Media Events
May 7, 2025
Munich, Germany
Solar Media Events
May 21, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
June 17, 2025
Napa, USA